Elko County, NV
Tribal Trust Land Status in Elko County, Nevada
Elko County contains two distinct pieces of Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone land -- the roughly 13,050-acre South Fork Reservation and the smaller Elko Colony -- plus a 2014 federal land transaction that touched both county and tribal boundaries here. None of it is zoned or transacted the way ordinary county land is. Here's the actual land-tenure picture and who to contact before assuming a parcel near either area is simply private land.
This page covers what's specific to Elko County. For the general explanation, see the national guide.
Two Te-Moak Tribe land bases sit inside Elko County
The Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada is a coalition government headquartered in the city of Elko, made up of four distinct bands, each with its own land base and governing council: the Battle Mountain Colony and Wells Colony (both outside Elko County, in Lander and Elko-adjacent counties respectively), the Elko Colony (a small land base at Elko itself), and the South Fork Reservation, roughly 13,050 acres of high-desert and foothill terrain about 28 miles south of the city of Elko, just west of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest in the foothills of the Ruby Mountains. South Fork was established by Executive Order in 1941 under the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act, built from land purchases totaling about 9,500 acres made between 1937 and 1939 and expanded since; all of its land is tribally owned rather than divided into individual member allotments. The Te-Moak Tribal Council holds overall jurisdiction across all four bands' lands, while each band's own council retains authority over its other internal affairs.
Trust, allotment, and fee land can sit inside the same boundary
Nationally, the end of the federal allotment era in 1934 left many reservations -- and South Fork is generally consistent with this pattern for Western Shoshone and other Nevada tribal land -- with a mixed land-tenure checkerboard: land held communally by the tribe in trust, land held by individual tribal members as an 'allotted trust' parcel still under federal government oversight, and land held by individuals in fee simple, which can be bought, sold, or mortgaged largely like ordinary private property despite sitting inside or near a reservation boundary. For a land buyer, that means a parcel's location near or within South Fork's boundary does not by itself tell you what you're looking at -- confirm directly whether a specific parcel is tribal trust land (not generally available for private purchase), an individual trust allotment (transferable only under BIA-supervised procedures and often subject to co-owner and heirship complications), or fee land (transactable through ordinary title and closing channels, though it may still carry easement, access, or right-of-way considerations tied to its location).
The 2014 Nevada Native Nations Land Act: a real, Elko-specific federal transaction
Congress addressed Elko County and Te-Moak land status directly in the Nevada Native Nations Land Act, enacted in December 2014 (based on S. 2480, following Senate Report 113-278). The law had two Elko-relevant pieces: it directed the Secretary of the Interior to convey roughly 275 acres of BLM-administered land to Elko County, Nevada, itself, at fair market value; and, separately, it authorized taking a number of parcels into trust for several northern Nevada tribes, including approximately 373 acres for the Te-Moak Tribe (the Elko Band specifically) -- a smaller, county-specific piece within a broader multi-tribe package that also included larger trust additions elsewhere in Nevada for the Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribe, the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of Duck Valley, the Summit Lake Paiute Tribe, and the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony. If you're evaluating land near Elko or the Elko Colony specifically, be aware that boundary and ownership status near these areas can reflect this relatively recent federal action rather than a long-static line -- confirm current status rather than relying on an older map or plat.
No HEARTH Act authority here: BIA approval still required to lease trust land
Under the federal HEARTH Act (2012), a tribe can obtain its own BIA-approved leasing regulations and then negotiate and execute surface leases on its trust land without a separate, lease-by-lease Department of the Interior approval -- a meaningful streamlining where it applies. As of this page's research, the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone does not appear on BIA's published list of tribes with approved HEARTH Act leasing regulations. Practically, that means any lease of Te-Moak trust land in Elko County -- whether South Fork Reservation or Elko Colony land, for residential, business, grazing, or other purposes -- still runs through the standard federal leasing process under 25 CFR Part 162, requiring case-by-case BIA review and approval rather than a tribally administered fast-track. Anyone evaluating a lease (not purchase) of Te-Moak trust land here should plan for that federal approval step and its timeline, and confirm the tribe's current leasing-authority status directly, since a tribe can obtain HEARTH Act approval at any point going forward.
What this means for evaluating land near tribal areas in Elko County
- Never assume a parcel is available for ordinary private purchase just because it sits near, or appears to sit within, the South Fork Reservation or Elko Colony boundary -- confirm trust, allotment, or fee status for that specific parcel before treating it as transactable land.
- For any parcel identified as an individual trust allotment, expect BIA-supervised transfer procedures and potential multi-heir/co-ownership complications rather than a standard title-and-closing process.
- For a proposed lease (rather than purchase) of Te-Moak trust land, confirm the tribe's current HEARTH Act status with BIA -- absent HEARTH approval, expect case-by-case federal review under 25 CFR Part 162, with the longer timeline that implies.
- For fee land near either tribal area, confirm access, easement, and right-of-way arrangements specifically -- a fee parcel surrounded by or adjacent to trust land can face access questions an ordinary rural parcel wouldn't.
- Contact the BIA Eastern Nevada Agency (the federal office serving Te-Moak and other northeastern Nevada tribes) directly for realty-status confirmation on a specific parcel, rather than relying on county GIS or assessor records alone, which may not reflect trust status accurately.
Ready to talk to someone who knows land?
Tell us what you're trying to do and we'll connect you with a local land specialist -- someone who understands zoning, perc, and access, not just listings.
Connect with a local land specialistSources
- Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada — Wikipedia (cross-checked against BIA and tribal sources) (accessed 2026-09)
- South Fork Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone — FamilySearch Research Wiki (accessed 2026-09)
- Tribal Directory — Nevada Department of Native American Affairs (accessed 2026-09)
- Senate Report 113-278 -- To Require the Secretary of the Interior to Convey Certain Federal Land to Elko County, Nevada, and to Take Land Into Trust for Certain Indian Tribes — U.S. Congress (GovInfo) (accessed 2026-09)
- Nevada Tribal Lands Transfer — Vote Smart (Congressional Record excerpt) (accessed 2026-09)
- Eastern Nevada Agency — Bureau of Indian Affairs (accessed 2026-09)
- HEARTH Act Leasing -- Approved Regulations — Bureau of Indian Affairs (accessed 2026-09)
- Chapter 7: Navigating Land Issues — Center for Indian Country Development, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (accessed 2026-09)
Last reviewed 2026-09