US Land Life

Scott County, KS

Well Water and Irrigation Rights in Scott County, Kansas

If a Scott County parcel is being sold on the strength of an irrigation well, the number that matters is not the water right's original authorized quantity -- it's that right's current allocation under GMD 1's Four County LEMA. The sliding-scale formula is specific and checkable, and so is a real appeals process that can move an individual right's number up or down from what a listing quotes.

This page covers what's specific to Scott County. For the general explanation, see the national guide.

The sliding scale, in specific terms -- and its legal starting point

The Four County LEMA did not appear informally -- it has a specific legal history. The Kansas Chief Engineer issued an Order of Decision approving GMD 1's Four County LEMA Management Plan on April 7, 2023, followed by a formal Order of Designation on May 10, 2023, putting the plan into effect for a five-year term running 2023 through 2027 across Wallace, Greeley, Scott, and Lane counties. The allocation formula itself is a sliding scale tied to each water right's own historical use, measured in inches applied per authorized acre over the 2011-2020 base period: a right that historically averaged under roughly 3 inches per authorized acre faces no required reduction at all, while a right that historically averaged more than roughly 12 inches per acre faces the maximum 25% cut from its historical usage. Rights between those two thresholds fall somewhere on the sliding scale between zero and 25%, which is why the districtwide average reduction lands around 10.5% even though individual rights can see anywhere from nothing to the full 25% cut.

The practical upshot for a buyer: two Scott County water rights with the same original authorized quantity on paper can carry very different actual LEMA allocations today, purely because of how intensively each one was historically pumped between 2011 and 2020. A right that was historically used conservatively keeps more of its paper value under the LEMA than one that was pumped hard during that base period -- which inverts the intuition that heavier historical use signals a 'more valuable,' more reliable right.

A real appeals process exists -- a listed allocation may not be final

GMD 1's Four County LEMA plan includes a formal appeals mechanism, and the district publishes its own Step-By-Step Appeals Guide and Appeals Memo to walk a water-right holder through it -- this is not an informal or discretionary courtesy. The plan recognizes appeals on three specific grounds: disputes over the verification of a right's historical water-use data itself, credit for previous voluntary conservation measures the right holder undertook before the LEMA's base period was set, and changes in a right's ownership or control that affect how its allocation should be calculated or attributed. Any of these three grounds can move a specific right's allocation away from a straightforward, mechanical application of the sliding-scale formula described above.

For a buyer, this cuts two ways. A seller quoting a water right's current LEMA allocation may be citing a number that is itself under active appeal, or that already reflects a successful appeal from an earlier point in the five-year cycle -- either way, the number on a listing or in a seller's disclosure is not necessarily the final word. Before valuing land on the strength of an irrigation right, ask GMD 1 directly for that right's current, GMD-confirmed allocation status, including whether any appeal is pending or was previously resolved, rather than relying on a pumping record or pro forma calculation performed independently of the district.

What to verify before buying irrigated Scott County land

  1. The specific water right's 2011-2020 historical use in inches per authorized acre, and where that places it on the LEMA's sliding scale -- ask GMD 1 directly rather than estimating from the right's original authorized quantity.
  2. Whether any appeal (use-history verification, voluntary-conservation credit, or ownership/control change) is pending or has already been resolved for that specific right, and what allocation number resulted.
  3. How many of the LEMA's five years (2023-2027) remain, and what GMD 1 has indicated so far about renewal or extension planning as the term approaches its scheduled end.
  4. Whether the parcel's water right is actually inside the Four County LEMA boundary as opposed to elsewhere in GMD 1's broader five-county service area, since the LEMA's specific rules apply only within its own defined footprint.

Ready to talk to someone who knows land?

Tell us what you're trying to do and we'll connect you with a local land specialist -- someone who understands zoning, perc, and access, not just listings.

Connect with a local land specialist

Sources

  1. Four County LEMA — Western Kansas Groundwater Management District No. 1 (accessed 2026-09)
  2. Proposed Four County LEMA, Western Kansas Groundwater Management District #1 — Western Kansas Groundwater Management District No. 1 (accessed 2026-09)
  3. GMD1 Four-County LEMA — Kansas Department of Agriculture, Division of Water Resources (accessed 2026-09)
  4. Board Guidelines for Appeals, Specialized Programs and Nonuse (Attachment E) — Western Kansas Groundwater Management District No. 1 (accessed 2026-09)
  5. Western Kansas farmers plan to cut irrigation in attempt to conserve water in the Ogallala aquifer — KCUR (Kansas City NPR affiliate) (accessed 2026-09)

Last reviewed 2026-09